Maria Foscarinis, NLCHP Executive Director, noted, “Homelessness in America is a human rights crisis right here at home. As foreclosures continue and the recession deepens, the crisis is affecting more and more Americans. But while some cities offer a helping hand, too often, as documented in our report, cities adopt unjust laws and practices that punish people simply for being poor and homeless.”
National Bankruptcy. Hyper-inflation. Severe Credit Crisis. The Death of the Dollar and the Euro. Socialism. Even Martial Law. For the first time since the Great Depression, the world’s problems have become our problems. And the experts all agree things will only get worse. Are you and your family ready to survive the catasrophe?
Two years in the making, this 9-disc set is loaded with information the popular media and our so-called leaders are purposefully not warning you about. Featuring exclusive, never-before-seen interviews with some of the biggest names in both alternative and mainstream thought, this riveting documentary can also be used as an interactive tutorial on everything you need to know to stop the crisis from worsening - and what to do if all else fails.
Also included are two exclusive booklets, not available anywhere else, How to Get off the Grid and How to Survive Martial Law, written by author, survivalist, and ex-military David Black. And if you order now we will include a 10th disc called "Conquering the Chaos - Sound Strategies in an uncertain world" for free.
Money, the Federal Reserve, the Current Economic Crisis and Financial Armageddon.
The Destruction of the Middle Class and the End of Democracy; How and Why the Middle Class is Being Destroyed and What That Means for Freedom in the U.S. and in the World.
The Forthcoming World-wide Police State/Surveillance Society and How the U.S. and many other Countries Have Already Taken Major Steps to Close Down Our Free Society.
The Globalist Agenda and the End to Nation Sovereignty.
How to Protect Yourself and Your Loved Ones from Financial Armageddon, the Police State, the End of Freedom and Democracy, and How to Take Your World Back.
Survival Guide featuring over 100 Actionable Tips, plus "What to Do When the Sh*t Hits the Fan", author David Black’s exclusive contributions: "How To Get Off The Grid" and "How to Survive Martial Law."
A Judeo-Christian Perspective on the Fall of America, the Globalist Agenda, the End of the Free world as We Know It, and the True Definition of the Antichrist.
How political agendas in media have destroyed our ability to get real news.
How our own governments are willfully destroying the rule of law.
The Power Elite's War on YOU and what to do about it.
How Republicans and Democrats are tip toeing us toward socialism
Featuring exclusive interviews with NY Times best-selling author Naomi Wolf; radio-talk show host/filmmaker Alex Jones; conservative icon and the father of Reaganomics Dr. Paul Craig Roberts; NYU professor Mark Crispin Miller; best-selling author David Icke; best-selling author Mickey Z; finance expert and author Doug Casey; Federal Reserve expert and best-selling author G. Edward Griffin; radio-talk show host Doug McIntyre; biblical scholar Ken Klein; journalist and constitutionalist Joseph Farah of World Net Daily; economist and precious metals expert David McAlvany; The Fall of America and The Western World: A Survival Guide is not just must-see viewing.
It could literally save your life.
THIS DVD BOX SET BRINGS TOGETHER VOICES FROM THE LEFT, THE RIGHT, AND THE CENTER TO GIVE YOU THE FACTS ABOUT WHAT IS HAPPENING TO YOUR WORLD. DONT BE FOOLED, THINGS ARE MUCH, MUCH WORSE THAN THE "CONSERVATIVES" AND THE "LIBERALS" ARE LETTING ON. WE ARE NOT HEADED OUT OF AN ECONOMIC RECESSION, WE ARE HEADED FOR AN ECONOMIC DEPRESSION FOLLOWED BY MORE UNREST, AND MORE, MUCH MORE POLICE STATE. THIS IS NOT FEAR MONGERING, NO THIS DVD GIVES YOU CLEAR, VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE OF WHAT IS HAPPENING TO OUR FREE WORLD AND WHY. THIS DVD GIVES YOU THE TRUTH THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA REFUSES TO GIVE YOU, INFORMATION YOU WILL NEED TO SURVIVE IN 2010, 2011, 2012 AND BEYOND...
Even though modern technology has improved bush craft techniques as well as your chances of survival, do not become dependent on it. When one becomes dependent on their gear it creates a false sense of security which will only set you up for disaster when that technology is no longer accessible. Your goal is to become completely self sufficient using only your ingenuity as the tool which you use to manipulate your surroundings, view using your gear only as a means to make up for your lack of knowledge ad experience until you become more proficient at bush craft.
That being said, modern disasters such as war,revolutions, and martial law do require you to use technology to successfully survive or even in some cases fightback. For starters you will need to know what gear to buy, where do I put it, and how do I use it; and where do I go with all these things. Three key points to remember while putting together your survival pack are one- PACK ONLY WHAT YOU NEED, two- PACK LIGHT, and three- DO NOT SACRIFICE FOOD WEIGHT FOR EXTRA AMMUNITION AND GUNS.
There are basically two types of survival packs which you can create to meet a wide array of emergencies. A 72
hour bug-out bag for a quick bailout with enough supplies to basically survive for 72hours comfortably, and a D-Day pack which is intended for the day when the Shit hits the fan a.k.a. Doomsday.
-72-Hour Bug-Out Bag-
The focus of this bag is evacuation rather than long-term survival being only with supplies to last 72-hours, hence the name bug-out bag. This bag in addition to allowing one to survive a disaster evacuation, may also be utilized when reacting to emergencies such as blackouts, natural disasters, and martial law.Though this bag manly contains items one would require to survive for seventy two hours, it can be packed with tools for long term use. This bag should be packed with the idea of keeping it as
light as possible.
Here are the basics to to constructing a Bug-out Bag modified to also deal with possible long term surivial.
Backpack- M.O.L.L.E.or A.L.I.C.E. pack
A disaster plan including location of emergency centers, rallying points, possible evacuation routes, as well as a map of the city/state/ or country you live in
Literature on what to do in various
types of disasters
Firearm and Ammo- a pistol or assualt rifle(depending where you want to keep the bag) with at least a 100rounds.
MRE or Dry Freeze rations/30
day supply of multi-vitamins
Katadyn Vario water micro filter/Micropur MP-1 tablets
Fire starting Tools: Ultimate Survival Blast Match Fire Starter,Firesteel (Armagedon size)Doan Magnesium stick, and a Windmill Ligther
First Aide Kit
LED flashlight
Emergency Radio with hand crank feature
Ecotant multi-purpose Gen. IV tent
G.I. Ripstop Poncho w/ Poncho linear
Steel GI canteen w/ canteen
cup
Cammenga 3H Lensatic compass
toitletries
Cash and coinage-
for when electronic transfers may not be a option
-D-DAY PACK-
Unlike the bug out bag this is actually more than just a pack, it is a complete
setup from head to toe with a combine weight of well over 50 pounds of gear which you will disperse over your body and in your A.L.I.C.E. pack .( note: this is not impossible, American soldiers carry just as much and sometimes even
more, this setup is very demanding on the body and mind. you must be in top physical shape to carry this burden ) This setup is intended for when the is no turning back, once you put this setup on this is pretty much all you have left to live off for who knows how long in anywhere from tropic jungles to arctic weather. The most extreme of disasters such as the fall of civilization and war are the situations this setup targets specifically.
Rucksack- This aside from your own skills and your knife is the key component to this setup. Everybody argues that this bag is
better than the other, military gear over civilian, so forth and so forth. Regardless of what pack you choose there are a few important factors that you must take into consideration when selecting your pack-durability, comfort, frame type, cost, and load capacity. We recommend a Large LC-2 A.L.I.C.E. Pack setup with the quick releases due to its proven durability with the U.S.A. military for over 50years, somewhat comfortable setup ( you can add additional padding), easily accessible pockets, having an external frame for better air circulation on your back, low cost, load capacity up to abut 90pounds, and having a wide array of add-ons. The only cons are that though the material of the sack is waterproof the pocket setup is not ( you will need to line the insides with either heavy duty trash bags, a A.L.I.C.E. pack liner, or individually bag everything), and how hard it may be to spot an authentic pack; for the market is flooded with cheap imatations. But here is a helpful guides along with facts that will help you make the right choice. One other thing to consider when purchasing any military setup like the A.L.I.C.E. or MOLLE, once you buy that pack you can only buy a vest,buttpack, or pouches that correspond with that setup.
Vest- The vest is where you will house most of your
equipment that you need to access on the go as well as attaching to your buttpack and utility belt.Recommendation: LC-2 load bearing vest
Buttpack-The buttpack is where you will store your tent along with other second priority equipment. recommendation: SPEC.-OPS.™ S. O. B.– SOLDIERS OPTIMIZED BUTTPACK
Belt- LC-2 pistol belt
Pouches- Any pouch with A.l.I.C.E. clips will do.
Must haves are the Cordura® lining LC-2 Canteen pouch ( only @ www.eagleindustries.com), two Compass vest pouches, and Multi-use/Ammo pouches corresponding to your weapon
Weapons of choice:
Primary- Any robust and accurate assault weapon in .223, 7.62 x 39, or any other widely used caliber throughout the military and public attached with a CQB two-point OR three-point sling. i.e-Ak-47 ( Bulgarian SA-93 or SLR-95, Egyptian Maddi, Hungarian SA-85M , VZ -58, AR-15
Secondary- Any robust and accurate pistol in 9mm, 45ACP, or any other widely used caliber throughout the military and pubic to be placed in any tactical leg holster . i.e.-Glock 17 or 21, Colt 1911, Para-Ordnance 1911 or hawg family types, Springfield XDs
(optional) Rifle- Thisrifles primary purpose serves as a hunting rifle so any high caliber accurate
rifle with a scope and sling will suffice. i.e. Springfield 03, M40A1 types
NOTE: you must also get a holster for your pistol(either on the belt or leg) as well as mag pouches or bag to hold your assault weapons mags.
AMMUNITION
NO MORE THAN 390rds(13 30rds mags )for the primary , and 7 mags for theSecondary. Here are some suggestions for brand and type of round by caliber:
9mm: Federal Premium Hydro-Shoc 124gr or Winchester Black Talon 7.62 x 39: Golden Tiger or Silver Bear 223: steel core
MAGS/CLIPS
It is always best to try to use manufacturer mags/clips rather than cheap imitations. Here is some suggestions for brand of mags.
AK-47 types: Bulgarian polymer
waffle pattern mags
KNIVES
Stay away from any Rambo looking knife or any so called survival knives with hollow handles and built in compasses, also a trench knife doesnt help you unless you are in trench warfare. The best type of knives are full-tang because of the strength and quality they offer. The four types of knives you will need are divided into bushcraft, primary( a large multi-use knife),folding( a small folding knife to work on threading and other delicate tasks), and hunting( skinning,gutting, cutting game). Here are our recommendations (all with leather sheaths):
Bushcraft: Fallkniven F1
Primary: Fallkniven A2
Folding: Fallkniven U2
(optional) Hunting: Fallkniven H1
Backpacking boots- these is very well the second key component of your equipment, for not having a good sturdy pair of boots will result in complete failure unless you plan to run around barefoot and with only the clothes on your back. Though everyone argues that this brand is better than the next, dont waste your time getting caught in that mess. Instead look for a boot that meets all the qualifications of greatness, which are the same no matter what brand it is. Remember this though when you finally decide to buy one: until you are fimilar with hiking boots DO NOT BUY YOUR FIRST PAIR WITHOUT TRYING THEM ON FIRST!! thats means do go out and buy what looks good on the internet, boot sizes run different from sneaker sizes not to mention sometimes different from other boot brands. Also make sure you to buy your boots a little bigger than your size because you will be wearing thick or multiple socks, the best way to get a good fit is to try on the boots while wearing the socks you instead to be using while you are hiking. Finally remember to break your new boots in for a good couple weeks before taking them out on the trail for the first time, otherwise you will get the worst blisters you have ever had. Here is a link to great website that describe the essentials of a god pair of backpacking boots:
Rag Wool-Ragg Wool has been in use well before hiking boots were even invented and still is the classic choice of fiber for backpackers socks. Ragg wool is still one of the best for the way it wicks moisture away from the foot, keeping the foot much more comfortable. The main problem with Ragg wool is that many people are unfortunately allergic to wool.
Merino Wool- Merino Wool is my favorite choice for socks. High quality merino wool has all of the good characteristics of Ragg wool without the problems. I recommend the SmartWool brand for their superior quality of the fiber as well as the construction of the sock.
Liners-Polypropylene is primarily used in liners (thin socks worn under the thicker main socks).Their purpose is to wick moisture away from the skin and out to the main sock, where it is dispersed. Liners can also reduce friction between the foot and the boot not to mention that if your boots are a little big, liners can fill in some of the extra space so your foot doesnt slide around.
Clothing- One word will take care of most of your clothing needs- ECWCS (Extended Cold Weather Clothing System) generation 3 . It consist of seven layers of clothing that can cope with any kind of climate except Tropic and Desert, this setup is pricey but well worth it. To compliment your ECWCS setup you should also pack a set of durable civilan clothes, so that you dont always have to be walking around in BDUs.
Undergarments- buy Merino SmartWool brand for everything from underwear to socks.
Gloves and Mittens- 100% Wool G.I. gloves and mittens are good for first level of protection,
but you will also need a pair of extreme cold mittens. I recommend this brand: http://www.bergans.no/sider_eng/start_produkter.asp<
Skimask/Scarfs/Neck gaiters- Again Merino SmartWool brand for the first layer skimask and neck gaiter. 100% Wool G.I. scarf will do and a Wool/acrylic outer layer ski mask will suffice.
(Optional)A lighter Pair of combat boots- Those backpacking boots are great for trekking through the rough terrain, but when in a urban landscape or when there is no need to lug around your A.L.I.C.E. pack then it would be a better choice to run/walk in a sturdy pair of combat boots, Bates is a good brand.
Compasses- There are two types of compasses which you will use to properly navigate on a topographic map(base compass) as well a by sight (sighting compass).
Base compass: Sunnto M-3D compass
Sighting compass:Cammenga 3H Lensatic compass
Backup(optional): Bruton 15tDCL
G.I. Boonie Hat
G.I poncho
G.I. Pancho Liner (can be used with poncho and tent to make bigger or as a blanket)
a Leatherman Wave
Lockpick set
100 FT Para (550)cord
Gransfor Bruks Forest
Axe
A roll of 100-mph tape
Steel GI canteen w/ canteen cup/xtra corks and lids
National Bankruptcy. Hyper-inflation. Severe Credit Crisis. The Death of the Dollar and the Euro. Socialism. Even Martial Law. For the first time since the Great Depression, the world’s problems have become our problems. And the experts all agree things will only get worse. Are you and your family ready to survive the catasrophe?
Two years in the making, this 9-disc set is loaded with information the popular media and our so-called leaders are purposefully not warning you about. Featuring exclusive, never-before-seen interviews with some of the biggest names in both alternative and mainstream thought, this riveting documentary can also be used as an interactive tutorial on everything you need to know to stop the crisis from worsening - and what to do if all else fails.
Also included are two exclusive booklets, not available anywhere else, How to Get off the Grid and How to Survive Martial Law, written by author, survivalist, and ex-military David Black. And if you order now we will include a 10th disc called "Conquering the Chaos - Sound Strategies in an uncertain world" for free.
Money, the Federal Reserve, the Current Economic Crisis and Financial Armageddon.
The
Destruction of the Middle Class and the End of Democracy; How and Why the Middle Class is Being Destroyed and What That Means for Freedom in the U.S. and in the World.
The
Forthcoming World-wide Police State/Surveillance Society and How the U.S. and many other Countries Have Already Taken Major Steps to Close Down Our Free Society.
The
Globalist Agenda and the End to Nation Sovereignty.
How to Protect Yourself and Your Loved Ones from Financial Armageddon, the Police
State, the End of Freedom and Democracy, and How to Take Your World Back.
Survival Guide featuring over 100 Actionable Tips, plus "What to Do When the Sh*t Hits the Fan", author
David Black’s exclusive contributions: "How To Get Off The Grid" and "How to Survive Martial Law."
A Judeo-Christian Perspective on the Fall of America, the Globalist Agenda,
the End of the Free world as We Know It, and the True Definition of the Antichrist.
How
political agendas in media have destroyed our ability to get real news.
How our own governments are willfully destroying the rule of law.
The
Power Elite's War on YOU and what to do about it.
How Republicans and Democrats are tip toeing us toward socialism
Featuring exclusive interviews with NY Times best-selling author Naomi Wolf; radio-talk show host/filmmaker Alex Jones; conservative icon and the father of Reaganomics Dr. Paul Craig Roberts; NYU professor Mark Crispin Miller; best-selling author David Icke; best-selling author Mickey Z; finance expert and author Doug Casey; Federal Reserve expert and best-selling author G. Edward Griffin; radio-talk show host Doug McIntyre; biblical scholar Ken Klein; journalist and constitutionalist Joseph Farah of World Net Daily; economist and precious metals expert David McAlvany; The Fall of America and The Western World: A Survival Guide is not just must-see viewing.
It could literally save your life.
THIS DVD BOX SET BRINGS TOGETHER VOICES FROM THE LEFT, THE RIGHT, AND THE CENTER TO GIVE YOU THE FACTS ABOUT WHAT IS HAPPENING TO YOUR WORLD. DONT BE FOOLED, THINGS ARE MUCH, MUCH WORSE THAN THE "CONSERVATIVES" AND THE "LIBERALS" ARE LETTING ON. WE ARE NOT HEADED OUT OF AN ECONOMIC RECESSION, WE ARE HEADED FOR AN ECONOMIC DEPRESSION FOLLOWED BY MORE UNREST, AND MORE, MUCH MORE POLICE STATE. THIS IS NOT FEAR MONGERING, NO THIS DVD GIVES YOU CLEAR, VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE OF WHAT IS HAPPENING TO OUR FREE WORLD AND WHY. THIS DVD GIVES YOU THE TRUTH THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA REFUSES TO GIVE YOU, INFORMATION YOU WILL NEED TO SURVIVE IN 2010, 2011, 2012 AND BEYOND...
A man who had been the subject of reporters all his life turned journalist in 1995 with the debut of George magazine. The motto for the publication was not just politics as usual. Its trademark became celebrity covers; the first issue featured Cindy Crawford dressed as George Washington, sporting a bra top, white wig and tight pants.”
The plotters of 911
murdered John F. Kennedy, Jr. in anticipation of their deed to assure his silence.
Summary of Evidence: John F. Kennedy, Jr. checked in with the FAA
Tower at Martha’s Vineyard at 9:39 p.m. on July 16, 1999.This check-in activates two alarm systems: one if the plane thereafter descends below 100’ outside the landing area, another if the plane fails to land within five minutes.Each alert should trigger an alarm and a search, but no focused search was begun for 15+ hours.The delay was required by his killers to find the downed plane and remove the battery from the cockpit voice recorder, remove the Flight Log that listed all passengers, and remove the body of the Certified Flight Instructor who was on the plane.Contrary to procedure, the Pentagon took control of the civilian crash
and “disappeared” crucial evidence.Even after honest FAA employees used Kennedy’s unique transponder identity to construct an N-Tap Radar Analysis of his entire flight from departure to crash – showing
a vertical nose-dive at the precisely located crash point -- the Air Force lied by pretending that the radar showed a normal descent, did not show where the plane went down, and that they could not be sure that the radar of the (crashed!) plane was the one they were looking for.Members of the establishment media were variously complicit in the cover-up of the murder,
or else first intimidated into silence, and then conscripted to smear Kennedy as reckless and irresponsible.
examining the death of John F. Kennedy, Jr. is not well known in the 911 Truth community, and it is not thought of as a 911 DVD, but it should be provided he meets the deserved caveats in the following endnote.style="mso-spacerun: yes"> Hankey does what regrettably so few 911 DVDs even attempt to do – to put his subject matter into an understandable historical context, identify the major protagonists and forces at play, provide a clear and convincing sketch of the motivations for their act, and most importantly,
amass and integrate a compelling body of evidence to reach his conclusion.At the center of this DVD sits a rock-hard proof that Kennedy, Jr. was murdered by high-ranking brass at the Pentagon.The major institutional conspirators at the operational level in the
death of JFK, Jr. are the FAA and the Air Force, just as in 911, with a crucial supporting cover-up role by the National Transportation and Safety Board and the establishment media.The true charm and force of Hankey’s production
is to juxtapose simultaneous media coverage filled with well sourced, damning hard facts – coverage that was quickly disappeared down the memory hole – with the outrageous lies trumpeted by the Pentagon and repeated by the media blasters as part of their complicity in the murder.As the narrative takes hold, you realize that you are watching the replay of a live execution.
Hankey’s movie consists of three parts: the historical background and motivation for the murder, the proof that a murder was committed and covered up, and the account of the technical means by which the murder was accomplished.The cornerstone is the central proof of the murder and cover-up – it is
a wholly self-contained and thoroughly gratifying proof and analysis, the strength of which is unaffected by the many unhappy weaknesses that undermine the other two parts.
style='font-size:15.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:15.0pt;font-family:"Copperplate Gothic Bold"'> Who Won World War II Who Cares About A Spoiled Rich Kid Who Crashed His Plane, And What The Hell has any of it got to do with 911?style='font-size:13.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt'>
For starters, Kennedy was not a spoiled rich kid, but a scion of a political family with a strong social conscience and with strong anti-fascist roots who had his own magazine, George, as a forum.style="mso-spacerun: yes"> John’s third birthday was spent at the state funeral for his father – the one imprinted in many of our memories with John-John’s famous salute on the cover of Life.Kennedy Jr.had never accepted the Warren Commission Report, and like his uncle Robert F. Kennedy who was murdered by the same forces of the American military-industrial war machine that killed JFK for opposing it and seeking peaceful coexistence with the USSR, Kennedy wanted to expose and if still possible bring to justice his father’s killers.
Kennedy, Jr. showed his interest in murders of state and covert operations by publishing an article by Oliver Stone stating that in the course of history powerful men typically murdered their opponents, and that JFK had been dispatched this way.George also published
“A Mother’s Defense” by Guela Amir, the mother of Yigal Amir, who was convicted of assassinating Yitzhak Rabin, the Israeli prime minister who offended the Israeli far-right by wanting to trade land for peace much as JFK had offended -- amongst others -- the military industrial complex and the Council on Foreign
Relations that wanted war in Vietnam and continued hostilities toward the USSR.Guela Amir revealed that her son had operated under the tutelage and training of a Shin Bet agent, Avishai Raviv, working for forces seeking to halt the peace process Gentle reader, if
you were part of the Project for a New American Century (PNAC) powers that were already hard at work in Florida to fix the 2000 Presidential Election with the help of former (CIA) drug runner Hank Asher working hand-in-glove with Jeb Bush and Katherine Harris; if you were part of that far-sighted group of global strategists actively “shaping” the future in which they would soon be navigating, following their New Pearl Harbor, by eliminating any “potential capacity” for resistance, would you want George and Kennedy, Jr. around? I do not think so.
You may wish to protest, “But
this is AMERICA!Who could do such a thing?!”Hankey’s general answer is that American industrial and banking finance leadership, the oil cartel in particular, has a potent fascist past that has been hidden and disguised from its people by the control that these very forces exercise over the media through ownership and influence.And though the general
answer is correct, Hankey weakens his case and presentation by claiming, falsely, that Hitler was a mere puppet of these “American Nazis” who supposedly ordered him about.Hankey claims literally that “the Rockefellers ran Auschwitz” until the end of WWII, and claims that these American Nazis are part of the Illuminati.
Underlying Hankey’s claims
seems to be an odd belief that whoever supports or trades with the Nazis is a die-hard Nazi himself, unlike the measured view of scholar Charles Higham that much of the American support for Nazism came from a “Business as Usual” attitude that put personal profit and global economic hegemony high above such petty if not irrelevant issues as patriotism – the pragmatic pro-Nazi Rockefeller clan, Nelson in particular, comes to mind.Higham also describes in detail the American
collaborators that were fascists to their core such as Henry Ford, Irené du Pont and elements of the Morgan group. But to be a real Nazi, as opposed to a garden-variety fascist, requires the racial bloodlust and desire to exterminate the likes of Jews, Roma, Slavs, and homosexuals as an intrinsic good.Du Pont not only traded with and protected
Nazi Germany throughout WWII, but he also heartily embraced core Nazi blood racism:
Irené du Pont was the most imposing and powerful member of the clan. He was obsessed with Hitler’s principles.He keenly followed the career of the future Führer in the 1920s, and
on September 7, 1926, in a speech to the American Chemical Society, he advocated a race of supermen, to be achieved by injecting special drugs into them in boyhood to make their characters to order.He insisted his men reach physical standards equivalent to that of a Marine and have blood as pure as that in the veins of the Vikings.Despite the fact that he had Jewish blood in his own veins, his anti-Semitism matched that of Hitler.
There is a important difference between a Hitler and a Himmler who want to kill all the Jews and a
mindless amoral functionary like Eichmann who takes pride in his technical proficiency at doing so, and say, a Nelson Rockefeller who plays both sides against the middle to maximize profits and give the American oil cartel a decided leg up on what he knew would be his greatly weakened post-WWII British competition, by turning against Britain the age-old strategy of divide-and-conquer that it had used against any continental power that became
too strong: let the Nazis, Britain, Western Europe and USSR bleed themselves white, and let American capitalists collect and count the chips.
In fact, the gross indifference of the Western powers to saving the Jews during WWII – refusing even to bomb Auschwitz or the trains running to it – cannot be made sense of without understanding that Great Britain, the United States, and the most powerful Zionists world-wide did not want a glut of refugee Jews fleeing Europe to Israel because such an influx at that time would have roused Arab opposition and destabilized the West’s control of the oil resources of the Middle East.One need not want to break bread with Lord Moyne, who did not want to risk British oil alliances, and refused the Jews entrance to British Palestine with the remark, “What can I do with this millio Jews?Where can I put them?”Nor need one be blind to Moyne’s anti-Semitism to see that he is not
a Nazi bent on exterminating all Jews.All such distinctions are lost on Hankey, so that he is too often left with pure evil as a motive when tactics and strategy
play crucial functional roles.
I don’t wish to make too much of these points. The distinction is becoming increasingly moot as the US pragmatic fascists for whom oil is more important than people join the purists, under the duress of resources increasingly unable to sustain world populations, in a war against their own peoples – part of a world-wide consolidation of power
against the peoples of advanced industrial societies.In any case, the dark side of the CIA, the Willmoore Kendall side that with William F. Buckley Jr. wanted to smash the Bill of Rights back in the 1950s and 1960s, now clearly has all but full control of the organs of state.
Hankey contends that these
dark fascist forces that had been planning 911 for some years beforehand, and who otherwise controlled the media, did not want to have a loose end like Kennedy, Jr. around which to navigate in their post-911 future.style="mso-spacerun: yes"> Hankey has a secondary thesis that may or may not be true: that “W” participated in the murder of JFK, Jr. as a rite of initiation, as his father did with JFK, to earn a place at the table of fellow killers.This secondary thesis is based on W’s disappearance for several days just before and after Kennedy’s death, is otherwise supported mostly by hunch
and intuition, is inessential to his most important claim, and will not be discussed here.
What Makes You Say JFK Jr. Didn’t Crash All By Himself?style='font-size:13.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt'>
On July 16, 1999, the night of his fatal crash, JFK Jr. was flying to Martha’s Vineyard in a Piper-Saratoga airplane with his wife Caroline and her
sister Lauren Bessette to drop off Lauren before flying to Hyannisport to attend the wedding of his cousin Rory the following day.Approximately 18 miles shy of the local airport, at 9:40:15 p.m., the plane went into a steep vertical dive and crashed into the sea, killing all aboard.Like
a good detective, Hankey sinks his teeth into one very meaty bone and refuses to let go until he has extracted all the information it can possibly yield: a full 15+ hours pass between the time of the crash and the onset of a focused
search for the missing airplane in the area where it was downed.There are only two reasonable answers: the FAA/Air Force were unable to conduct a focused search for the downed plane with its VIP passengers until 15+ hours after the crash because they only learned
the location of the crash site at that time; or, the delay served an operational function in the execution or cover-up of the murders (e.g., making sure everyone was dead, removing vital evidence of foul play).Let’s see what kind of VIP treatment was
extended to Kennedy and company.
At approximately 12:30 p.m. the following day, Petty Officer Todd Burgun of the Public Information Office of the Coast Guard made what for him was a routine press announcement that he
had been advised by FAA that at 9:39 p.m. Kennedy’s plane was holding steady and contacted air traffic control at Martha’s Vineyard to clear for final descent.Hankey does not ask you to take his word for what Burgun said, he plays the television interview with Burgun’s live report.Kennedy made contact with the air traffic controllers at Martha’s Vineyard in preparation for landing.style="mso-spacerun: yes"> There can be no doubt that Burgun’s source was FAA because (as three dimensional radar subsequently showed) at 9:38 p.m. Kennedy was adjusting his altitude to be above the required minimum to contact FAA for landing, and at 9:40 p.m. his plane was plunging into the sea.style="mso-spacerun: yes"> Then, like a clarion cry of guilt by the perpetrators, Burgun’s announcement was disappeared from the media, the FAA and Coast Guard were silenced, and all press communication was taken over by the
Pentagon under the pretext “because it’s an easily used facility.”
Why was Burgun’s report disappeared down the memory hole?It is very simple.When a plane contacts the FAA, its radar blip is logged into the FAA system by its tail-number, in this case N529JK. If that plane descends below 100 feet outside its normal landing area, an automatic alert is sounded and a search is launched at the point where the transponder-generated radar signal disappeared. Furthermore, once a plane has contacted FAA and been cleared for landing, if that plane does not land within five minutes, a search is automatically launched.Thus, because Kennedy made contact with the FAA tower in Martha’s Vineyard, there could be no viable explanation for the delay in the focused search, so the inconvenient fact of Kennedy’s contact with the tower was made
to disappear.The special VIP treatment extended to Kennedy was that no focused search was launched until 15+ hours later, and as Hankey reminds us, this special treatment was provided by the same institutional perpetrators of 911 – high-ranking bureaucrats in the FAA and leadership in the Air Force (General Richard Myers).
Instead, once the Pentagon took over, Lt. Colonel Steve Roark – Hankey repeatedly underscores the name in the tradition of The White Rose – tells the press, “I only know for sure that they did not talk to the tower at Martha’s Vineyard.”We will return to Roark momentarily, but what is the Kennedy family doing while the plane is missing?According to USCG Rear Admiral Richard Larrabee of the US Coast Guard, at 02:15 a.m. a family friend telephoned to report the plane missing and asked
that a search and rescue effort be launched.Hankey asks the right question – Why is this family friend, Carol Ratowell, calling the Coast Guard instead of the FAA?Hankey’s well-documented answer is that because the FAA had by that time repeatedly stonewalled the family, Ratowell tried the Coast Guard as the last resort.The Coast Guard, in turn, contacted the FAA who contacted the Air Force, which in turn told the Coast Guard that the Air Force was now in charge.The Air Force ignored the precise data available to the FAA to locate the plane and instead sent the Coast Guard to search an area 100 miles distant from where the plane even might have crashed, but otherwise did nothing
until being forced to do so.
Ted Kennedy, understanding the murders of his brothers by the far right wing, and himself most likely almost their victim when he was the sole survivor of a small plane
crash that broke his back, desperately called Chief of Staff Norman Podesta at 6:30 a.m., who in turn called Clinton at 7:00 a.m., who in turn ORDERED the Air Force to begin a search, which began “a wild goose chase” over a 20,000 square mile area with two planes and two helicopters. style="mso-spacerun: yes"> Don’t think that everyone who participates in the cover-up understands its purpose, or likes it: Roark is often clearly uncomfortable lying, but he had made his decision to follow orders, so the banality of evil, as usual, rears its slothful head.
Are we jumping to conclusions?Perhaps Roark is an untrained bureaucratic novice?No,
Roark is the current Director of the USAF National Rescue School and the former director of the Air Force Rescue Coordination Center who has participated in over 1,000 search and rescue missions.But it is worse than that: you or I could read that graph without any problem.This is how the murder of a
famous political figures and its cover-up are done directly in front of the US media despite many honest front-line reporters.
There’s more.Kennedy’s Piper Saratoga was equipped with an emergency locator transmitter, a beacon that goes off after a crash and
signals via satellite the location of the crash site within feet to the FAA.Did the beacon fail?No, because ABC news coverage has visuals of
the precise location of the crash site as determined by the ELT, that the newscasters attributed to the ELT, with a little ELT logo to let you know the source of the data.How does the Air
Force – now Media Central – handle this?The Air Force ignores the facts and announces that its dilatory broad-ranged search is happening and will continue because Kennedy failed to
file a flight plan (which would give them his course on which to check) and nevermade contact with any FAA Air Traffic Controllers along his route, so the Air Force had to search blindly.But Hankey has amassed documentation that shows that before this flight Kennedy always filed a flight plan and always checked in for safety reasons with FAA along his route, that he was a careful, cautious, extremely conscientious non-aggressive pilot.
style='font-size:15.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:15.0pt;font-family:"Copperplate Gothic Bold"'>So Why Did The Killers Need 15+ Hours to Find The Plane?
The dream of a petty criminal is to commit the perfect crime without leaving a clue, but the dream and the reality of the state criminal is to commit the perfect crime by having control of the crime scene to remove the incriminating evidence, and to have control of the investigation to eliminate any loose ends.The murderers of John F. Kennedy, Jr. had control of the organs of state.But what did they want to remove?Some small things, and some larger things.
The Piper Saratoga is equipped with a flight voice recorder that records the last minute of voice communication from within the aircraft.But when that recorder was recovered, the battery necessary to preserve its content was missing.
Kennedy always kept his Flight Log in an aquamarine duffle bag.A newspaper report reproduced in the DVD gives photos of the duffle bag and the names of eyewitnesses who saw it found intact, but the Flight Log was reportedly not in the bag.
Removal of the Flight Log from the duffel bag would require being on the scene before the plane was officially found, and there is evidence strongly suggesting that is precisely
what happened.Lt. Colonel Richard Stanley of the Civil Air Patrol had initiated a search for the missing plane on dry land off Martha’s Vineyard by 7:30 a.m., and advised the news media that at that time – hours before the official focused search and discovery – he had
seen Coast Guard helicopters circling the area; but the Coast Guard later advised that those were not their helicopters.Hankey concludes reasonably that these were the killers’ helicopters.
Why does the Flight Log matter?Because the Flight Log contains
a list of the passengers on that flight.But don’t we know the passengers on that flight?Not exactly.When family friend Carol Ratowell phoned the Coast Guard at 2:15 a.m.
she advised that there was a Certified Flight Instructor (CFI) on board, but his body was never found, and one of the seats of the aircraft also was missing.Why does it matter whether a CFI was on board?Because the NTSB would find that there had been no mechanical failure of the airplane, making
the crash a matter of pilot error – Kennedy’s pilot error – a scenario that requires disappearing the CFI.Thus, part of the cover-up was a smear supposedly leaked to the media by an anonymous Kennedy “family member” that Kennedy was the only pilot aboard and that Kennedy
may not have been properly licensed to fly that plane, which he had purchased only two months before.As Hankey skeptically remarks, this is just the kind of rumor that no real family member would ever leak to the media, hence we are hearing a planted story from the
plotters.So the big part of the clean-up operation was to find and remove the body of the CFI, passenger seat included, something that Hankey says took so long because the plane sank.
Another media smear that Hankey
deftly documents is a New York Post headline blaring “John Didn’t Want to Fly” leaked by a psychopathic liar and plagiarist in the service of the Mossad, C. David Heymann, as described by London Observer reporter Andrew Goldman and memorialized at http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/CRASH/JFK_JR/goldman.html.
Hankey mounts a persuasive
argument that a CFI was on board using both circumstantial inference and direct historical precedent.The three principal passengers had assembled by 7:30 p.m., yet they waited an additional 45 minutes to take off even though weather conditions were worsening, and even though Kennedy’s license was valid for clear-vision conditions but would not have been valid for hazy or stormy weather that compromised vision.Kennedy made a phone call shortly before take-off,
but the NTSB failed to investigate to whom it was made and what was discussed, contrary to standard procedures.Kennedy could get a CFI at a moment’s notice even if the one scheduled failed to appear.Kennedy was still getting used to his new plane and had never flown it
without a flight instructor.Kennedy had passed the written and hands-on tests for instrument certification that would permit him to fly it in any weather, and all he needed for the certification was to log additional hours with a CFI.Kennedy, a stickler on rules and procedures, had made eight flights to Martha’s Vineyard
in the prior month and on five of those occasions bad weather would have made his flying the plane without a CFI beyond the scope of his license, something he would have been very unlikely to risk with his wife and sister-in-law aboard.Hankey offers additional arguments for the CFI’s presence that cumulatively
are very powerful.To be explicit, the force of the argument for the CFI is augmented within the context of the well-documented lies and cover-up to justify and explain the 15+ hour delay needed to assure the missing voice recorder battery, the missing flight log, and the missing CFI so that the crash could be blamed on pilot error.
But What About the National Transportation Safety Board!?
Hankey’s subject matter includes the corruption and infiltration of the federal organs of state power by a criminal bureaucracy that is fascist at its core and that is fully capable of misinforming, intimidating, and controlling the innocent members of these institutions to do their bidding. style="mso-spacerun: yes"> The NTSB answers the question of whether or not Kennedy has a CFI with him firmly, authoritatively, and apparently decisively, seeming to put to rest such silliness as Hankey proposes.In a January 27, 2000 investigative report,
NTSB interviewer David Muzio quotes CFI Robert Merena, who had flown with Kennedy more than a dozen times, as speaking with Kennedy the day he died, July 16, 1999, and offering to fly with him.Kennedy declined, saying, “I want to do it alone.”The quote made headlines, and following as
it did in the wake of a vast orchestra of lies and deceits, embedded the meme in the American public mind that the poor stupid careless lazy self-indulgent Kennedy got what he deserved, too bad about Caroline and Lauren; worse, this contemptuous opinion about Kennedy came to the average American as his own spontaneous idea.
Of course, if the Kennedy crash were simple pilot error, there would have been no need for all the previously documented lies, so something is amiss, and Hankey performs with
sure-handed humorous bravo in stripping this falsehood naked.Gosh! mocks Hanke it took the NTSB six months to get around to interviewing Merena who had this crucial information.Then he looks at the NTSB file and sees that Muzio had interviewed Merena earlier and in a July 21, 1999 report, dated just five days after the crash, stated, “The instructor [Merena] was not aware of the pilot [Kennedy] conducting any flights in the accident
airplane without an instructor aboard.”Gosh again, mocks Hankey, maybe Muzio and Merena never talked about Merena’s final words with Kennedy on the fatal day.No, because the file contains a letter from Merena to the NTSB dated July 21, 1999 – apparently a letter that Merena wrote and brought to his
interview with Muzio that day – that describes their final conversation.Are we being asked to believe, asks Hankey rhetorically, that Merena offers to fly with John F. Kennedy, Jr. the very day that Kennedy crashes his plane, and that Kennedy declined, saying “No, I want to do it alone,” yet Merena neglects to mention this in his letter, and
neglects to mention it to Muzio five days after the crash?Are we to believe this even though Merena’s final conversation with Kennedy was discussed with Muzio five days
after the crash?Are we to believe that all that ever was said is that Merena was not aware of Kennedy flying in that plane alone on prior occasions?We
might as well believe that pigs can fly.
................
Hankey’s hunch that “W” had to participate in the murder of Kennedy Jr. to earn a seat at the killer’s table may or may not be correct, and his account of the mechanics of how Kennedy Jr. was killed may or may not be correct – a matter discussed in the
Appendix – but it does not matter.What matters is that Hankey has given us a full-court satisfying proof that John Kennedy Jr. was murdered by a fascist ruling class in direct control of the
Pentagon, FAA and subordinate governmental bureaucracies such as the NTSB, and with the media fully intimidated and controlled at its core by the owners and mangers who belong to the ruling class, and who keep at bay, largely by
suasion, bluff and distraction the relevant and penetrating inquiries of the front-line reporters.Linda Killian of People Magazine, who asked why it took so long for the Air Force to learn about the missing plane, knows not to force her way up the chain of
command with, “The Pentagon is covering up!You’ve got to let me work on this.”
One In A Series Aimed At a Tyrannical End State
The study of the state murders of JFK, X, MLK, and RFK; the USGIC domestic terror operations of WTC93, OKC and 911 is only partly about proving that they were inside jobs – they all reek and shout this truth once the facts are assembled.Rather, such a study has as its proper subject the structure of political power within the United States ruling class, the plans that the rulers have for us and for this country’s future, and if possible stopping them and changing those plans.The political assassinations of the 1960s, and the more recent ones, were to deprive the progressive and radical left of their singularly effective voices – it is no accident that COINTELPRO only swung into its full stride of frame-ups and murders after these voices were stilled.The acts of domestic terror were to usher in the police state under the façade of fighting terrorism.
Where does the fascism reaching out to embrace us come from?Hankey’s answer, and mine, is that it has long been a part of the American landscape.My answer, not Hankey’s, is the Old Left answer that fascism is simply monopoly capitalism in times of stress when the rights and welfare of a democratic working middle class must be smashed.Presently, the destruction of these rights serves the vast enrichment of the ruling class at the expense of the poor and middle class, and also “shapes” the future by depriving the ruled of even the “potential capacity” to organize and resist as
the advanced civilizations will too soon no longer be able to support and to pacify their populations into obedience because the benefits of abundant non-renewable energy and resources are now coming to an end.style="mso-spacerun: yes"> Purist and pragmatic fascists here join hands.
Malcolm X famously said of the first Kennedy assassination “The chickens have come home to roost.”style="mso-spacerun: yes"> Malcolm meant that it is impossible for a ruling class to cultivate a troop of murdering thugs to undermine and destroy democratic governments abroad without that same ruling class using those same murdering thugs to implement their political plans at home by destroying democracy.Don’t take my word for it.Hear it from the mouth of ruling class scribe Harrison Salisbury during a period in 1975 when he was particularly disaffected with the predations of the imperial war in Southeast Asia and the violations of its charter that the CIA routinely engaged in domestically. style="mso-spacerun: yes"> Salisbury, who later rose to become an associate editor of The New York Times, used to meet with Director of Central Intelligence Allen Dulles to share useful intelligence acquired in pursuit of his trade,
and Harrison would engage in elevated conversation with Dulles and a group of polished, well-educated, well-dressed and sophisticated intellectual gentlemen.
“There were
no sharp edges—well almost no sharp edges.Usually there would be one man in the small group who was silent throughout the polite talk.His suit did not come from Brooks.It came off the rack.And his face did not come from the Ivy League.It was not relaxed or handsome.It was harsh-featured and there was likely the look of a weasel in it.This man would sit through the whole conversation, his back to the wall, saying nothing, ignored by the others.When the conversation was over and Allen Dulles was shaking hands and expressing his deep appreciation, the silent man would slide into the background, saying nothing, not offering to shake hands; as you were walking out, you would remember that he had never been introduced.
[The style of the CIA has changed since its inception.]But the fundamental question remains what it has been all along.Which is the real face of the CIA—the clubbable avuncular face of Dulles, or the hawklike visage of the silent man with the ill-fitting clothes, suggestion of garlic breath, and deft hand with a short angle iron?”
Salisbury’s essay leaves no doubt that to ask that very question is also to answer it.style="mso-spacerun: yes"> Philip Agee, the former CIA officer whose efforts to stop the Agency’s predations abroad in the service of US ruling class imperialism moved Congress to stop him by means of the 1982 Intelligence Identities Protection Act, also answers it explicitly.style="mso-spacerun: yes"> Controlled dictatorships abroad are good for American business.After quitting the Agency, Agee explains to a former colleague still with the CIA:
Goulart was President [of Brazil]
as a result of democratic elections. Did we care? Hell no. The Agency organized and financed so much turmoil the country seemed ungovernable, and that’s just what the military needed. At the right moment they sent Goulart packing and set up their own government. And what’s happening there today, after eight years of military rule? Institutionalized torture by security services the Agency trained.
The Left [in Greece] had been the principal resistance movement during the Nazi occupation.After the war first
the British, then the Americans, intervened to install and sustain corrupt, conservative regimes.Through savage political repression, just as in Chile, they tried to exterminate the Left.The CIA was the
main instrument, working through the police and security services.They set up the Greek CIA, the KYP, trained its people and gave it money and equipment.Then, when it looked like a moderately reformist government might come to power through elections, the [CIA-backed] “colonels” staged a coup using a sham “communist plot” as pretext. Echoes of Latin America. For the next seven years Greece lived under
a fascist military regime, led almost to the end by the colonel who had been the KYP’s chief liaison officer with the CIA.Thousands of Greeks went through that regime’s prisons and torture chambers,
and thousand were forced to live in exile.
[And while on the run from the CIA in Italy, Agee sees that he is being followed and reflects.]I
started getting that feeling, like emotional choking.Fuckin’ Italian services.They’re even worse than the Spanish.The Agency set them up after the war with the same officers that served Mussolini.They just got a new name.Still as fascist as ever, and up to their necks in right-wing bombings and assassinations.style="mso-spacerun: yes"> And I’m all alone. No witnesses.What the Christ do I do now?
Gentle reader,
you may appreciate that these are no longer abstract or theoretical matters, even though the barbarism of the ruling class is being masked as such in learned society, trying to keep in place the mask of the tweedy academic rather than the garlic-breathed thug with the short angle iron.Listen to the pertinent excerpt from a “debate” between the learned John Yoo, now a professor of law at the University of Berkeley, formerly one of the unholy coterie of legal fascists – notably David Addington and Alberto Gonzales – dedicated to undermining the US Constitution.style="mso-spacerun: yes"> The debate occurs at Columbia University on December 1, 2005, regarding whether there are any legal or Constitutional constraints on the President’s authority to torture.
The reasons may be slight indeed, as Canadian citizen Maher Arar found out when he was detained in New York while on route to a Tunisia for vacation, and then rendered to Syria where he was systematically tortured for 10 months though he had no links to any terror organizations.style="mso-spacerun: yes"> The Royal Canadian Mounted Police were not apologetic.Instead they circulated lies about Arar to justify their actions and were backed up by the USGIC-supported neo-fascist Howard government as well as the neo-fascist press of Canada’s ruling class who underscored not the danger of savaging civil rights, but the danger
that a case like Arar’s might cause hesitation to do so................ http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/green/TheAssassinationOfJFKJr.html
HOUSTON Hard on the heels of the health care protests, another citizen movement seems to have sprung up, this one to oppose Washingtons attempts to tackle climate change. But behind the scenes, an industry with much at stake Big Oil is pulling the strings.
Hundreds of people packed a downtown
theater here on Tuesday for a lunchtime rally that was as much a celebration of oils traditional role in the Texas way of life as it was a political protest against Washingtons energy policies, which many here fear will raise energy prices.
Something we hold dear is in danger, and thats our future, said Bill Bailey, a rodeo announcer and local celebrity, who was the master of ceremonies at the hourlong rally.
The event on Tuesday was organized by a group called Energy Citizens, which is backed by the American Petroleum Institute, the oil industrys main trade group. Many of the people attending the demonstration were employees of oil companies who work in Houston and were bused from their workplaces.
This was the first of a series of about 20 rallies planned for Southern and oil-producing states to organize resistance to proposed legislation that would set a limit on emissions of heat-trapping gases, requiring many companies to buy emission permits. Participants described the system as an energy tax that would undermine the economy of Houston, the nations energy capital.
Mentions of the legislation, which narrowly
passed the House in June, drew boos, but most of the rally was festive. A high school marching band played, hot dogs and hamburgers were served, a video featuring the country star Trace Adkins was shown, and hundreds of people wore yellow T-shirts with slogans like Create American Jobs Dont Export Them and Ill Pass on $4 Gas.
The buoyant atmosphere belied the billions of dollars at stake for the petroleum industry. Since the House passed the bill, oil executives have repeatedly complained that their industry would incur sharply higher costs, while federal subsidies would flow to coal-fired utilities and renewable energy programs.
Its just a sense of outrage and disappointment with the bill passed by the House, said James T. Hackett, chief executive of Anadarko Petroleum, who attended the rally. He defended, as an environmental measure, the use of buses financed by oil companies and Energy Citizens to carry employees to the rally. If we all drove in cars, it wouldnt look good, he said.
While polls show that a majority of Americans support efforts to tackle climate change, opposition to the climate bill from energy-intensive industries has become more vigorous in recent weeks. The Senate is expected to consider its own version of the bill at the end of September.
A public relations firm hired by a pro-coal industry group, the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity, recently sent at least 58 letters opposing new climate laws to members of Congress. An investigation by the House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming found that a total of 13 letters sent by the firm, Bonner & Associates, were forgeries. The committee is currently investigating another 45 letters to determine whether they are fakes. The letters purported to be from groups like the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People and Hispanic organizations.
Bonner & Associates has acknowledged
the forgeries, blaming them on a temporary employee who was subsequently fired. The coal coalition has apologized for the fake letters and said it was cooperating with an investigation of the matter by a Congressional committee.
For its part, the oil industry plans to raise the pressure in coming weeks through its public rallies so that it can negotiate more favorable terms in the Senate than it got in the House. The strategy was outlined by the American Petroleum Institute in a memorandum sent to its members, which include Exxon Mobil, Chevron and ConocoPhillips. The memorandum, not meant for the public, was obtained by the environmental group Greenpeace last week.
Its a clear political hit campaign, said Kert Davies, the research director at Greenpeace.
In the memorandum, the president and chief executive of the American Petroleum Institute, Jack N. Gerard, said that the aim of the rallies was to send a loud message to the Senate. He said the rallies should focus on higher energy costs and jobs. Its important that our views be heard, Mr. Gerard wrote.
Cathy Landry, a spokeswoman for the American Petroleum Institute, confirmed the contents of the memorandum, but said that the rally was not strictly an institute event and that Energy Citizens included other organizations representing farm and other business interests.
The House bill seeks to reduce greenhouse gases in the United States by 83 percent by 2050 through a mechanism known as cap
and trade, which would create carbon permits that could be bought and sold. President Obama initially wanted these permits to be entirely auctioned off, so that
all industries would be on the same footing, but the sponsors of the bill agreed to hand out 85 percent of the permits free to ensure passage of the legislation.
The power sector, which accounts
for about a third of the nations emissions, got 35.5 percent of the free allowances. Petroleum refiners, meanwhile, got 2.25 percent of these allowances, although the transportation sector accounts for about 40 percent of emissions. That means oil companies would have to buy many of their permits on the open market, and they contend that they would have to raise gasoline prices to do so.
But Daniel J. Weiss, a senior fellow
at the Center for American Progress, a research and advocacy organization, said that refiners would be allowed to keep the value of the free allowances they received, while public utilities would be required to return the value of their permits to customers.
There is a myth out there that this is a giveaway to utilities, Mr. Weiss said. Its not true. The oil industrys goal is to block or weaken efforts to tackle global warming.
The rallies have opened a rift within the industry. Royal Dutch Shell, an initial supporter of climate legislation, said that it had told the institute that it would not participate in the rallies, although its employees would be free to attend if they wanted to. ConocoPhillips, meanwhile, has opposed the bill since its passage and, in a note on its Web site, encouraged employees to attend the rallies.
Since Mr. Obamas election, the oil industry has lost some clout in Washington. The rally on Tuesday gave voice to the feeling among employees of oil companies that their industry
was being battered.
I experienced Carters war against the industry, and Im tired of being pushed around, said David H. Leland, a geological map maker for NFR Energy. We provide a product for a reasonable price, and were going to be punished for doing a damn good job.
Clifford Krauss reported from Houston, and Jad Mouawad from New York
In a stunning blow to mountaintop removal blasting operations in the Coal River Valley of West Virginia this morning, two fearless protesters scaled massive trees and unfurled banners from their 80-foot-high platforms. Within 300 feet of the Massey Energy's Edwight mountaintop removal blasting site, above Pettry Bottom and Peachtree
in Raleigh County, West Virginia, the protesters called on the federal agencies to crack down on the scandal-ridden West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (WV DEP) and the stop the unsafe and reckless blasting in the area.
As part of a growing coalfield uprising, this dauntless action has brought the gripping images and realities of the mountaintop removal nightmare in the Appalachian coalfields to the Beltway-bound offices of the EPA, the Council on Environmental Quality and the transitioning Office of Surface Mining.
Last Friday, Charleston Gazette
reporter Ken Ward broke the story on a blockbuster internal memo from a WV DEP biologist that criticized the agency head Randy Huffman for his gross oversight over the long-lasting adverse impacts of mountaintop removal mining that are indeed significant.
As the 13th direct action in
the coalfields this year, today's daring protest raises the stakes in the coalfield uprising, as residents called on federal regulators to respond to the failed state agency's lack of enforcement and its blatant circumvention of regulations, as millions pounds of ammonium nitrate/fuel oil explosives continue to blast every day in the lush mountain communities in West Virginia, Kentucky, Tennessee and southwestern Virginia.
I am sitting in this tree to halt the blasting that endangers the residents of Pettry Bottom and Clays Branch, protester Laura Steepleton said. The people of Pettry Bottom, Clays Branch are living below a land slide waiting to happen and the only barrier between fallen trees, mud, boulders and water and the Pettry Bottom community is a wooden stake and tarp fence. The DEP needs to step in and protect its citizens - not Massey Energy - stop the blasting above Petty Bottom, and end mountaintop removal.
Associated with the Climate Ground
Zero and Mountain Justice campaigns, the tree sitters say they will not willingly descend until blasting ceases above Pettry Bottom, Massey Energy pays the full cost of healthcare and home repair for Pettry Bottom and Peachtree residents, and the Federal Office of Surface Mining commits to supervising the full reclamation of the Edwight mine.
Here's a shot of what flyrock can do to a house in the blasting area:
Last month, Clay's Branch area resident Bo Webb wrote former Vice President Al Gore an urgent letter to intervene in the Coal River Valley. Webb described the nightmare of living in a blasting area and recounted how federal violations have been skirted by state environmental regulators, who openly sought to work around federal regulations:
As you know, the Obama administration recently announced a series of regulatory initiatives to strengthen oversight and regulation, minimize adverse environmental consequences of mountaintop coal mining. While I have great admiration for President Barack Obama, energy advisor Carol Browner, and his new EPA administrator Lisa Jackson and CEQ chief Nancy Sutley, the reality is that their regulations can easily be avoided through loopholes.
While federal regulators were able to temporarily halt blasting above my home, I recently learned from the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection that the green light has been given to renew the blasting closer to the coal seam, in an area that is even closer to our Clay's Branch homes.
Here's a video of the blasting near Clay's Branch and its shower of flyrock, silica dust and heavy metals on area residents:
As the top source of information in the coalfields, Ken Ward's Coal Tattoo's blog has been packed with WVDEP news lately, including a recent OSM report that scolded the embarrassing state agency's lackluster enforcement of blasting and flyrock regulations:
Due to the significant danger of flyrock, it is recommended that in all cases, OEB institute the cessation of blasting activity in the area where flyrock originates and
adjacent areas until an investigation is completed an prescribed changes are implemented by the company to ensure there is a reasonable expectation that flyrock will not occur again from the same cause.
WVDEP's response to that recommendation?
OEB does not feel it is necessary to issue an [imminent harm cessation order] or cease blasting on all flyrock cases. It is the inspector's call as to whether or not the individual incident warrants an IHCO. However, OEB will take multiple incidents into consideration in determining if blasting should cease.
As one of the most devastating blows to Gov. Joe Manchin's embarrassing WV DEP chief Randy Huffman, WV DEP biologist Doug Wood's internal memo last week pointed out the destructive and long-term impacts of mountaintop removal:
We know have clear evidence that in some streams that drain mountaintop coal quarry valley fills, the
entire order Ephemeroptera (mayflies) has been extirpated, not just certain genera of this order. We also have evidence that some streams no longer support the order Plecoptera (stoneflies). Some genera of stoneflies are particularly sensitive to high total dissolved solids just as some mayfly genera are.
So, in streams below valley fills where stoneflies have survived, that order's diversity has been diminished. There are other genera and species of other orders of benthic macroinvertegrates that have been negatively impacted by streams draining mountaintop coal quarries, not just a few genus [sic] {Note --the sic is Woods correcting Huffman's choice of words} of mayflies
The loss of an order of insects from a stream is taxonomically equivalent to the loss of all primates (including humans) from a given area. The loss of two insect orders is taxonomically equivalent to killing all primates and all rodents through toxic chemicals.
Jeff Biggers is the author
of The United States of Appalachia [1], and the forthcoming, Reckoning at Eagle Creek: The Secret Legacy of Coal in the Heartland (The Nation/Basic Books).
The League of Conservation Voters calls them President Obama's "Green Dream
Team": Carol Browner, the White House climate czar; Lisa Jackson, the EPA administrator; Ken Salazar, U.S. secretary of the interior; and Steven Chu, U.S. secretary of energy. These men and women have the ear of the president, as well as the power, budget, and commitment to right what many environmentalists see as the wrongdoing of the Bush administration. This fall they will try to pass landmark climate-change legislation in the Senate; approve and oversee countless projects
funded with stimulus money and push for international standards for carbon emissions at the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen. They've been lauded by green advocates and lobbyists and pilloried by Republicans and moderate Democrats (particularly from states where industries such as coal still dominate). Whatever your feelings may be about their agenda, one thing is certain: they've only just begun.
Carol Browner keeps the lowest public profile of the foursome but arguably has attracted the most criticism. She's the first-ever White House czar on climate
change, a position that some conservatives say is too vaguely defined. Yet, she's hardly new to Washington. She served as the EPA administrator under President Clinton, worked as Sen. Al Gore's legislative director, and remains close to John Podesta, President Clinton's former chief of staff who ran the Obama transition team. Originally, she supported Hillary Clinton's bid for the Democratic nomination. But thanks to Podesta, she ended up on Obama's original tight-knit transition team and never left that fold.
She has always been viewed as a staunch environmentalist who once called President George W. Bush the "worst environmental administrator ever". Critics argue this makes her a poor ambassador to Republicans and moderates in Congress. This question of whether Browner can build consensus will be crucial in the coming months. She's the administration's go-to arm twister: the person who wooed House members and counted votes to narrowly pass the climate-change bill on June 26 in the House, 219 to 212. Her goal is to get multiple federal agencies working together, rather than independently of each other—which has historically been the case in D.C. One success story so far is how Browner helped to broker a partnership between the EPA and Department of Transportation to
come up with new fuel-efficiency standards that will require cars made in 2012 and beyond to ultimately get at least 35.5 miles per gallon. And, in the fall, all eyes will be on her to push the climate-change legislation through the Senate: a topic she didn't want to broach on the record. Through a White House spokesman, Browner said in an e-mail: "As we continue our dialogue with the Senate, we are confident that most senators share the president's goal of providing clean
energy incentives that will wean the U.S. off of our dependence on foreign oil by transforming our energy economy."
Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar is another Washington insider, who spent four years in the Senate representing Colorado. Salazar originally raised his national profile by working with Republicans on the immigration bill, but he's studied energy and environmental policy for years. He's also worked as Colorado's attorney general and as the director of the Colorado Department of Natural Resources. Still, he's not a total tree-hugger; his family background in farming and ranching gives him some street cred in those industries.
Salazar speaks in a low-key, friendly style—an attitude that can belie the
complexity of some of his initiatives, such as renewable-energy projects, particularly solar. His agency hopes to set aside tracts of public land in Nevada, Arizona, California, and Wyoming for solar energy facilities. "On the renewable-energy front, I don't think there's much more that we could be doing," he says.
Salazar arrived at the sprawling Department of Interior, in part, because he grew up in the West (an informal prerequisite for past secretaries). His appointment initially bothered some environmentalists who questioned what they saw as his close ties to the ranching and mining industry. But heading up an agency that has a $17.2 billion budget and that oversees 500 million acres of land isn't a job that everyone wants—particularly since the department historically has been fraught with scandals.
Like Salazar, Lisa Jackson oversees a huge, complex agency at the EPA. Her reputation was built on her ability to navigate bureaucracies as well as her pragmatic and direct attitude. She worked for the EPA for 16 years in both Washington and New York before taking a post in the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, where she eventually rose to commissioner. There, she was known for setting up standards to reduce the state's greenhouse—gas emissions (a foreshadowing of the fuel efficiency standards that her agency and the Department of Transportation worked on this spring). Some environmentalists in New Jersey, though, were critical of the way she oversaw the state's constellation of Superfund sites, arguing that she was too close to the industries and companies that caused the pollution. So far, as the EPA administrator, she's received praise for diplomatically and strategically tackling problems from fuel efficiency to stricter rules surrounding the protection of endangered animals. Moving forward, she says the EPA will need to spend an "awful lot of time" monitoring the spending of the stimulus money. "If states don't spend the money, we'll move it," she says.
Secretary of Energy Chu was President Obama's wildcard pick—the first Nobel prize-winner in physics to occupy the top energy slot. Chu is a passionate scientist who views global warming as the most pressing concern of the day, but he admits that he's no bureaucrat. Early on, he ran into trouble when he talked off-the-cuff about OPEC production and oil prices without, he says, fully understanding the issue. Even now he's not the master schmoozer, but he has the respect of the country's scientific community who is grateful to have one of their own in office.
In the coming years, Chu will oversee the $39 billion that the stimulus has added to his department's budget. Even if he's not the one personally lobbying senators to support the climate-change bill, Chu loves to talk about global warming. He can't help himself. "We have door No. 1 and door No. 2," he says. "We're going to save the planet, or we're going to wish things were the way they were."
This eclectic group—with all of their expertise in science, energy policy, and advocacy—still can't be shielded from the skepticism and quandaries that will inevitably arise over the next three and half years. Among the challenges: when Congress returns from its August recess, it will deal with a mountain of competing agendas including passing health-care reform. It's possible that one of the president's key projects, the climate-change bill, could morph into an overlooked stepchild, as many conservatives hope it will become. "They had to pay off everybody to get it out of the House," says Myron Ebell, director of energy and global warming policy at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank. "There's negative momentum coming out of that."
If the Senate does not pass the bill, its death could have a domino effect, and slow movement on global environmental policy. It will be hard to negotiate carbon-emission standards at the December meeting in Denmark if the U.S. government can't pass stricter policies on its own turf. "Copenhagen will either be a milestone or a tombstone," says William Antholis, managing director of the Brookings Institution.
Members of the cabinet admit to feeling the heat. They all want to pass the bill, but they also need to work on conservation projects and push the economy in the direction of green technology. Already, there's pressure to act faster. Much of the stimulus still hasn't been doled out, and those green jobs? Well, there's money for them but the actual jobs don't yet exist. And, of course, there's doling out of the stimulus money. "They need to ensure the stimulus money is well spent," says William Reilly, a former EPA administrator under President George H.W. Bush. "It'll be very challenging to get the funds out responsibly in the time frame that they promised—and make sure there are no embarrassments a year or two down the road."
This is a huge to-do list for a crew that took office less than a year ago and who are still hiring their staffs. Even fans say they may have expected too much, too soon. "I think they're doing pretty well," says Eileen Claussen, president of the Pew Center on Global Climate Change. "But then again, I've been around D.C. for a long time." And, it's only time that will be the true measure of their success. The question now: can they sustain the political capital, goodwill, and momentum of these first several months?
Denny Carr, MFA
Photographer and Video Artist
BIKE !!!! hase lepus trike (stroke-paralysis)
age 61 eco-friendly no-car
"I am a stroke survivor and deal daily with a speech disorder called Aphasia. This disorder is a result of my stroke in 2005. I am thankful God has given me the ability to express myself through my images and films." For more information, visit these websites: http://www.azimagery.com/