Tuesday, September 8, 2009

Don't Get Rolled

http://www.DontGetRolled.org

Once upon a time, corporate titans
bankrolled our elections with no limits. There were no social safety nets, no real labor laws, and no voting rights for most Americans. There were the haves and have nots. This fall, a century of modest limits on corporate influence in politics could be completely rolled back, crushing progress on health care, the environment, energy, economic recovery … on everything!

The Supreme Court on September 9
hears a case, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, that reopens the question of unlimited corporate money in our elections. In a stunning move, the Court will reach back and reconsider two other pivotal campaign finance cases settled long ago. The potential result?

A century-old pillar of campaign
finance doctrine could be swept away. Sound like a good idea? Sounds so very last, last century — except this time it wouldn’t be the robber barons — it would be the giant, multinational corporations buying our politicians outright.

Don’t let our elections and progress get rolled by corporate power! PLEDGE TO PROTEST! Pledge to protest getting rolled on September 9!

Everyone can protest — check out our ideas for actions. We want to collaborate and share your stories, pictures, and videos! Send your pics and YouTube links to action@citizen.org.


Untold Truths About the American Revolution By Howard Zinn, July 2009 Issue

There are things that happen in the world that are bad, and you want to do something about them.

You have a just cause. But our culture is so war prone that we immediately jump from, “This is a good cause” to “This deserves a war.”

You need to be very, very comfortable in making that jump.

http://howardzinn.org/

The American Revolution—independence from England—was a just cause. Why should the colonists here be occupied by and oppressed by England? But therefore, did we have to go to the Revolutionary War?

How many people died in the Revolutionary War? Nobody ever knows exactly how many people die in wars, but it’s likely that 25,000 to 50,000 people died in this one. So let’s take the lower figure—25,000 people died out of a population of three million. That would be equivalent today to two and a half million people dying to get England off our backs. You might consider that worth it, or you might not. Canada is independent of England, isn’t it? I think so. Not a bad society.

Canadians have good health care. They have a lot of things we don’t have. They didn’t fight a bloody revolutionary war. Why do we assume that we had to fight a bloody revolutionary war to get rid of England? In the year before those famous shots were fired, farmers in Western Massachusetts had driven the British government out without firing a single shot. They had assembled by the thousands and thousands around courthouses and colonial offices and they had just taken over and they said goodbye to the British officials. It wasa nonviolent revolution that took place. But then came Lexington and Concord, and the revolution became violent, and it was run not by the farmers but by the Founding Fathers.

The farmers were rather poor; the Founding Fathers were rather rich. Who actually gained from that victory over
England? It’s very important to ask about any policy, and especially about war: Who gained what? And it’s very important to notice differences among the various parts of the population. That’s one thing were not accustomed to in this country because we don’t think in class terms. We think, “Oh, we all have the same interests.” For instance, we think that we all had the same interests in independence from England. We did not have all the same interests. Do you think the Indians cared about independence from England? No, in fact, the Indians were unhappy that we won independence from England, because England had set a line—in the Proclamation of 1763—that said you couldn’t go westward into Indian territory. They didn’t do it because they loved the Indians.

They didn’t want trouble. When Britain was defeated in the Revolutionary War, that line was eliminated, and now the way was open for the colonists to move westward across the continent, which they did for the next 100 years, committing massacres and making sure that they destroyed Indian civilization.

So when you look at the American Revolution, there’s a fact that you have to take into consideration. Indians—no, they didn’t benefit. Did blacks benefit from the American Revolution? Slavery was there before. Slavery was there after. Not only that, we wrote slavery into the Constitution. We legitimized it. What about class divisions? Did ordinary white farmers have the same interest in the revolution as a John Hancock or Morris or Madison or Jefferson or the slaveholders or the bondholders? Not really. It was not all the common people getting together to fight against England. They had a very hard time assembling an army.

They took poor guys and promised them land. They browbeat people and, oh yes, they inspired people with the Declaration of Independence. It’s always good, if you want people to go to war, to give them a good document and have good words: life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Of course, when they wrote the Constitution, they were more concerned with property than life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

You should take notice of these little things. There were class divisions. When you assess and evaluate a war, when you assess and evaluate any policy, you have to ask: Who gets what? We were a class society from the beginning. America started off as a society of rich and poor, people with enormous grants of land and people with no land.

And there were riots, there were bread riots in Boston, and riots and rebellions all over the colonies, of poor against rich, of tenants breaking into jails to release people who were in prison for nonpayment of debt. There was class conflict. We try to pretend in this country that we’re all one happy family. We’re not. And so when you look at the American Revolution, you have to look at it in terms of class. Do you know that there were mutinies in the American Revolutionary Army by the privates against the officers?

The officers were getting fine clothes and good food and high pay and the privates had no shoes and bad clothes and they weren’t getting paid. They mutinied. Thousands of them. So many in the Pennsylvania line that George Washington got worried, so he made compromises with them. But later when there was a smaller mutiny in the New Jersey line, not with thousands but with hundreds, Washington said execute the leaders, and they were executed by fellow mutineers on the order of their officers. The American Revolution was not a simple affair of all of us against all of them. And not everyone thought they would benefit from the Revolution.

We’ve got to rethink this question of war and come to the conclusion that war cannot be accepted, no matter what the reasons given, or the excuse: liberty, democracy; this, that. War is by definition the indiscriminate killing of huge numbers of people for ends that are uncertain. Think about means and ends, and apply it to war. The means are horrible, certainly.

The ends, uncertain. That alone should make you hesitate. Once a historical event has taken place, it becomes very hard to imagine that you could have achieved a result some other way. When something is happening in history it takes on a certain air of inevitability: This is the only way it could have happened. No. We are smart in so many ways. Surely, we should be able to understand that in between war and passivity, there are a thousand possibilities.

Howard Zinn is the author of “A People’s History of the United States.” The History Channel is running an adaptation called “The People Speak.” This article is an excerpt from Zinn’s cover story, "Just Cause Does Not Equal Just War." in the July issue of The Progressive. http://www.progressive.org/zinn070309.html


http://www.youtube.com/user/federaljackdotcom
FEDERALJACK.COM is an alternative news web site. We cover anything from police brutality to the New World Order takeover of the free world. We have no corp sponsors and are totally user supported. We offer the truth so people can get a real idea of what is going on. Many people are asleep, and its time to wake them up. Knowledge is power & the difference between slavery and freedom. Educate yourself. MEDIA FAIL: MSNBC pushes Government Propaganda about H1N1 Vaccine Swine Flu Warning & Update http://www.federaljack.com/2009/08/24/swine-flu-vaccine-linked-to-paralysis-leaked-memo-reveals/


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lAl4TQvRzHw http://www.youtube.com/user/SACRAMANIACSmc


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdrGKwkmxAU

http://www.sourcewatch.org/=Military-industrial_complex

Top Ten Companies 2002
1 - Lockheed Martin Corporation $17 billion
2 - Boeing Company $16.6 billion
3 - Northrop Grumman Corporation $8.7 billion
4 - Raytheon Company $7 billion
5 - General Dynamics Corporation $7 billion 6 - United Technologies Corporation $3.6 billion
7 - Science Applications International Corporation $2.1 billion
8 - TRW Incorporated $2 billion
9 - Health Net, Inc. $1.7 billion
10 - L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc. $1.7 billion

Bookmark and Share

Bechtel Group, Inc. defense contractor money from oil, gas & chemicals and from government contracts

Carlyle Group military-industrial complex the billionaire George Soros

Corporatocracy Boeing and Lockheed Martin, - World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the World Trade Organization,

Halliburton_Company world's largest providers oil and gas and military services industries - $2.7 billion Iraq - Walter Reed by awarding a $120 million contract.


http://www.eisenhower.archives.gov/

"War is mankind's most tragic and stupid folly; to seek or advise its deliberate provocation is a black crime against all men. Though you follow the trade of the warrior, you do so in the spirit of Washington--not of Genghis Khan.

For Americans, only threat to our way of life justifies resort to conflict."      

Dwight D. Eisenhower - Graduation Exercises at the United States Military Academy, 6/3/47



"The hope of the world is that wisdom can arrest conflict between brothers.
I believe that war is the deadly harvest of arrogant and unreasoning minds.
And I find grounds for this belief in the wisdom literature of Proverbs.
It says in effect this: Panic strikes like a storm and calamity comes like a whirlwind

to those who hate knowledge and ignore their God."     

Dwight D. Eisenhower - Address at the Centennial Celebration Banquet of the National Education Association, 4/4/57


http://my.opera.com/azimagery/blog/2009/09/04/american-casino-movie

No comments:

Twitter

steetsblog.blogspot.com

    follow me on Twitter
    Blogo is a weblog editor for Mac OS X designed for speed and ease of use. Blogo is easy for beginners, but powerful enough for probloggers. Now with Twitter and Ping.fm support!

    Social Bookmarking

    US Deaths in Iraq since March 20th, 2003

    Child - Global Warming vs. Poverty

    human right

    Trikes Bike

    My photo
    Denny Carr, MFA Photographer and Video Artist BIKE !!!! hase lepus trike (stroke-paralysis) age 61 eco-friendly no-car "I am a stroke survivor and deal daily with a speech disorder called Aphasia. This disorder is a result of my stroke in 2005. I am thankful God has given me the ability to express myself through my images and films." For more information, visit these websites: http://www.azimagery.com/

    you biked health active

    heaven = bike green

    usa earth=auto pollutants

    usa environmentally friendly ???

    usa environmentally friendly ???
    Walk, cycle, public transportation

    grand canyon

    grand canyon